![]() It was strange the software returning that same setting. At that time the lens had +5 in the AFMA settings but that is because one day, to my eye, when I went out to try the lens for the first time I have put it at that setting because the image looked better in terms of focus. Felt like it just needed a couple of mm to be in focus. On the other day I went out and did some shots wide open and also at f/2 to test the lens out and the images were not in focus as well. Not a surprise the images didn't come out in focus. Being a portrait lens you expect to take picture at 1.5m or so from your subject if you want shoulder or half-chest. Picking up the 2.9m test the AFMA came out to be +5. The recommendation to perform the test for the 85mm is around 3.5m but because on the room I was I didn't have enough space I did it at 2.9m and also tried at 2.1m. I have used a very well lit room with artificial lighting. I have performed the calibration just out of curiosity whilst still waiting for the delivery of the targets but don t know if it will make a big difference. ![]() I have performed the calibration as it is suggested with the exception of the target in which the one I used was a printed version of the physical targets that they sell. However, I am finding the results for the 85mm not in line with what I was expecting, that is, the AFMA that I got does not serve my needs. ![]() I got this software to perform calibration on my lenses specially for the 85mm f/1.2L II. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |